Skip to content
← Back to Dashboard
FINALXfinity Mobile Arena · Nov 1
UTA rest: 2dPHI rest: 3d

Utah Mammoth at Philadelphia Flyers: score, goals, shots, period-by-period stats and the HabsMetrics prediction made before puck drop, from the NHL’s official data. Analytics for educational purposes only — not gambling advice.

Game analysis

Flyers beat Mammoth 6–3

  • C. Dvorak scored the game-winner at 1:02 of the third.
  • An empty-net goal sealed it late.
  • D. Vladar stopped 19 of 22 shots (.864) for the win.
  • Power play: PHI 0/2, UTA 2/5.
  • J. Drysdale led all scorers with 0 goals and 3 assists.
  • Model miss: the Flyers won with only a 47% pre-game win probability.

HabsMetrics Analytics — for educational/analytics purposes only — not gambling advice.

Three stars

  1. 1st star
    T. Konecny

    PHI · 1G 1A

  2. 2nd star
    J. Drysdale

    PHI · 0G 3A

  3. 3rd star
    N. Cates

    PHI · 1G 1A

Scoring summary

Period by Period

Stats not yet available

Team Stats

UTAPHI
Team statistics comparison
Shots----
Hits2630
Blocked1216
Power Play2/50/2
Faceoff %48.151.9
Corsi %53.946.1
xG2.582.64
Giveaways1821
Takeaways42

Philadelphia Flyers

Player statistics for Philadelphia Flyers
PlayerGAP+/-SOGTOI
033+5021:26
112+3113:58
112+2117:03
112+2113:02
022+4223:28
011+1015:14
1010210:44
011+1214:32
011+1020:57
0110216:04
----35/38--.92160:00
----19/22--.86400:00

Utah Mammoth

Player statistics for Utah Mammoth
PlayerGAP+/-SOGTOI
022-3318:26
112-2218:10
022-4419:16
011-1219:08
101-1113:42
101-3224:32
000-4419:18
000+1112:22
0000010:10
000-1013:41
----25/31--.80658:25
----15/21--.71400:00
UTAaway
53%
at
PHIhome
47%
Win probability6-pt gap
Model pick
UTA · 53% to win

Key signals

Team Offense (Goal Model)Team Defense (Goal Model)Home IceInjuriesProjected Goaltending

For educational/analytics purposes only — not gambling advice

Game Analysis

Projected score

UTA
3.0
–
PHI
2.8

Most likely final: PHI 2–3 UTA · Actual: 6–3

PHI win
47%
UTA win
53%
Goes to OT/SO
25%

Likeliest scorelines

  1. PHI 2 – 3 UTA9%
  2. PHI 3 – 2 UTA8%
  3. PHI 3 – 4 UTA7%
  4. PHI 4 – 3 UTA6%
  5. PHI 1 – 2 UTA6%

Goal totals & margins

6+ total goals
49%
7+ total goals
39%
PHI by 2+
21%
UTA by 2+
27%

Key factors (goal margin, + favors home)

  • Team OffensePHI scoring -15% vs league average, UTA +7% (time-weighted goal model).-0.68
  • Team DefensePHI allowing -3% vs league average, UTA +2%.+0.16
  • Home IceLeague-wide home scoring edge of +5% applied to PHI.+0.14
  • InjuriesPHI without Nikita Grebenkin, Rasmus Ristolainen; UTA without John Marino, Michael Carcone, Maveric Lamoureux.+0.08
  • Projected GoaltendingProjected starters vs an average goalie, shrunk by shots faced: Joseph Woll (PHI) -0.00 g/gm; Karel Vejmelka (UTA) -0.07 g/gm.+0.06

HabsMetrics Analytics — for educational/analytics purposes only — not gambling advice

Lineups

UTA

Actual (from shift data)
L1
15:14
19:18
18:26
19:16
L2
9:53
12:25
19:08
18:10
L3
11:03
72Lee
14:21
13:41
13:41
L4
8:12
12:22
15:20
10:10
D1
12:34
24:32
22:02
D2
13:45
18:28
17:51
D3
11:19
14:42
13:42
58:25
Starter
0:00
Backup

Injured / Scratched

PHI

Actual (from shift data)
L1
9:43
17:03
17:08
13:58
L2
9:43
13:02
15:31
14:32
L3
8:46
13:21
15:49
13:31
L4
8:57
15:14
16:04
10:44
D1
14:32
23:28
21:26
D2
14:11
20:57
17:47
D3
12:08
17:27
15:16
60:00
Starter
0:00
Backup

Injured / Scratched

HabsMetrics Analytics — for educational purposes. Lines are inferred from shared five-skater ice time in NHL shift data; projections are estimates.

For educational/analytics purposes only — not gambling advice